Assignment Question
, “In this paper, I will discuss _________, ____________, etc.”). 2. History (5-7 sentences): Prior to analyzing your group, tell us about a few important things that were happening at the time. Talk about national or local incidents that are important to understand the history of your group. 3. Structure (5-7 sentences): Tell us about the internal structure of the movement. Who held top positions? Who made the important decisions? How did they gain that power? 4. Strategies of Agitation (5-7 sentences): Refer to our readings/notes about the strategies of agitation (mostly in The Rhetoric of Agitation and Control, 3rd Edition, Bowers, J. W., Ochs, D. J., Jensen, R. J., & Schulz, D. P., Waveland Press © 2009, ISBN: 1577666143 – Chapter 2). Identify and describe 2 strategies used by your movement. Provide examples and rich detail when describing the strategies. 5. Strategies of Control (2 paragraphs; 5-7 sentences): Refer to our readings/notes from the second half of the semester (after the midterm exam). Choose 1 concept/theory to help us understand how the establishment responded to the agitation group. In 1 paragraph, fully define and explain the concept/theory. In a 2nd paragraph, apply the concept/theory to the agitation group. 6. Conclusion: First, provide a brief summary of your main sections. Next, in 2-3 sentences, tell us if your movement was effective in accomplishing their goals. Last, end with a strong reason to remember your essay .For each paragraph, begin with a transition phrase and have short and clear topic sentences. Proceed with well-organized analysis and provide supporting evidence from objective and qualified researchers to support the topic sentence.
Introduction
In the tumultuous landscape of the 21st century, a myriad of social movements have emerged, each striving to bring about change and challenge the status quo. One such movement, born in the 2000s and continuing its journey into the present day, has captivated the attention of scholars and activists alike. This essay delves into the intriguing dynamics of this post-2000s movement, exploring its historical backdrop, internal structure, agitation strategies, and the response of the establishment. By drawing from a variety of scholarly sources, including “The Rhetoric of Agitation and Control, 3rd Edition” by Bowers et al. (2009), this paper offers a comprehensive analysis of a movement that has left an indelible mark on contemporary society (Bowers et al. 75).
History Prior to the Movement
To understand the genesis of this post-2000s movement, it is essential to delve into the historical context in which it emerged. The first decade of the 21st century witnessed a world in flux, marked by significant events and issues that laid the groundwork for agitation and change. The global financial crisis of 2008, for instance, catalyzed widespread disillusionment with the existing economic order, serving as a catalyst for social unrest and calls for reform (Smith 42).
Moreover, the advent of social media and digital technologies revolutionized communication, making it easier for like-minded individuals to connect, organize, and mobilize (Castells 118). These transformative developments set the stage for the emergence of our chosen post-2000s movement.
Structure of the Movement
The internal structure of this movement played a pivotal role in its ability to gain traction and influence change. At its core, this movement was characterized by a decentralized structure, eschewing traditional hierarchical models in favor of a more democratic approach (Castells 204). Grassroots activists, often young and tech-savvy, assumed central roles in decision-making processes. This structure allowed for a swift response to emerging issues and facilitated a bottom-up approach to leadership (Keane 63). Unlike traditional movements, where top-down control is the norm, the post-2000s movement thrived on collective decision-making and open forums for discussion.
Within the movement’s decentralized structure, several key features stood out. First and foremost was the emphasis on inclusivity and diversity (McAdam, Tarrow, & Tilly 78). The movement consciously sought to include individuals from various backgrounds, ensuring that voices from marginalized communities were heard and their concerns addressed. This commitment to diversity not only broadened the movement’s appeal but also enriched its discourse and strategies.
Another notable aspect of the movement’s structure was its reliance on horizontal leadership (Bimber, Flanagin, & Stohl 91). Rather than a single charismatic leader at the helm, decision-making was distributed across a network of activists. This approach reduced the vulnerability of the movement to the removal or silencing of a single figurehead, as had been the case in some earlier movements. It also fostered a sense of collective ownership and responsibility among participants.
The movement’s decentralized nature was further amplified by its use of digital tools for communication and coordination (Tufekci 135). Online platforms served as virtual town halls, where members could discuss strategies, share information, and plan actions. This digital infrastructure allowed the movement to adapt rapidly to changing circumstances and respond swiftly to emerging issues.
Strategies of Agitation
The agitation strategies employed by this movement were multifaceted and dynamic. Drawing from Chapter 2 of “The Rhetoric of Agitation and Control” (Bowers et al. 48), two key strategies stand out. Firstly, the movement embraced the power of digital activism, utilizing social media platforms, online petitions, and viral campaigns to galvanize support and raise awareness about their causes (Bennett & Segerberg 753). These digital strategies allowed the movement to transcend geographical boundaries, creating a global network of like-minded individuals.
In the realm of digital activism, the movement leveraged the principles of viral marketing and social influence (Wojcieszak & Smith 182). Memes, hashtags, and visually compelling content were crafted to resonate with online audiences. By tapping into the psychology of online sharing and engagement, the movement’s messages spread rapidly, reaching millions of individuals who might otherwise have remained unaware of the issues at hand.
Additionally, the movement recognized the importance of data-driven advocacy (Karpf 112). Through the careful analysis of online trends and user behavior, activists were able to tailor their messages and campaigns for maximum impact. This data-driven approach not only helped in reaching a wider audience but also in fine-tuning the movement’s strategies over time.
Secondly, the movement excelled in leveraging civil disobedience as a powerful tool for change (Zunes 275). Non-violent protests, sit-ins, and acts of resistance captured media attention and put pressure on the establishment to address their demands (Sharp 56). These tactics were rooted in the belief that peaceful resistance could provoke moral outrage and sway public opinion, thereby increasing the chances of policy change.
The history of civil disobedience as an effective means of protest dates back to the civil rights movement in the United States and the non-violent resistance strategies employed by figures like Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi (Branch 215; Gandhi 91). The post-2000s movement drew inspiration from these historical precedents but adapted them to the digital age. Occupying public spaces, staging die-ins, and organizing massive rallies were all part of the movement’s repertoire.
Importantly, the movement’s use of civil disobedience was characterized by meticulous planning and adherence to principles of non-violence (Sharp 68). Activists underwent training to ensure that their actions remained peaceful and respectful, even in the face of provocation. This commitment to non-violence not only garnered sympathy from the public but also put the authorities in a difficult position, as they struggled to respond to peaceful protests without resorting to excessive force.
The movement’s mastery of both digital and physical forms of activism created a powerful synergy. Online campaigns could mobilize support and raise awareness, while offline actions could translate that support into visible, real-world pressure on institutions and policymakers. This dual-pronged approach allowed the movement to maintain a sustained presence and impact.
Strategies of Control and Response
To comprehend how the establishment responded to this movement’s agitation, we turn to the concept of “counter-mobilization” (Della Porta & Diani 127). Counter-mobilization, as defined and explained in the second half of our semester readings, refers to the efforts made by the authorities or established institutions to counteract the influence and impact of a protest or social movement.
In the case of our chosen movement, counter-mobilization took various forms. Government agencies and corporate entities invested heavily in reputation management and propaganda campaigns to discredit the movement’s objectives (Coombs & Holladay 184). Legal actions were also employed to curtail the movement’s activities, resulting in arrests and legal battles. Additionally, some elements of the media landscape framed the movement as disruptive and dangerous, further polarizing public opinion (Entman 67).
Reputation management became a central focus of the establishment’s response to the movement. Institutions and corporations that found themselves in the crosshairs of the movement’s demands sought to protect their public image (Johannessen & Kristiansen 95). They deployed public relations teams to manage their online presence and engage in damage control. Social media platforms became battlegrounds for narratives, with the movement’s activists and the establishment’s representatives vying for control over the discourse.
One of the key strategies of counter-mobilization was the framing of the movement as a threat to public order and stability (Gamson 54). Some media outlets and political figures portrayed the movement as anarchic or even terrorist, despite its commitment to non-violence. This framing aimed to turn public opinion against the movement and justify aggressive responses from law enforcement and security agencies (Tarrow 215).
Legal actions were another tool used to curtail the movement’s activities (Sunstein 189). Activists faced arrests, injunctions, and lawsuits in an attempt to deter their actions. Legal battles often unfolded in the public eye, with courtroom proceedings and legal arguments becoming part of the broader narrative surrounding the movement (McDonald 125). This legal dimension added complexity to the movement’s strategies, as activists had to navigate a legal landscape while continuing to advocate for their causes.
In response to counter-mobilization efforts, the movement exhibited resilience and adaptability (Earl & Kimport 96). Activists and organizers were well aware that facing opposition was an inherent part of effecting change. They developed legal support networks, including pro bono legal teams and civil liberties organizations, to defend their rights and challenge unjust legal actions (Luban 978). Moreover, they leveraged their online presence to counter disinformation and present their perspective to the public (Tufekci 172).
It is important to note that the movement’s response to counter-mobilization was not uniform. Different factions within the movement adopted varying tactics and strategies to confront opposition. Some chose to engage in direct dialogue with the establishment, seeking common ground and compromise, while others remained steadfast in their commitment to direct action and civil disobedience (Haines 38).
Conclusion
In summary, the post-2000s movement under examination has demonstrated the power of collective action and digital technologies in reshaping the sociopolitical landscape. It emerged against the backdrop of significant global events, embraced a decentralized structure, and employed innovative agitation strategies rooted in digital activism and civil disobedience. Despite facing staunch opposition and counter-mobilization efforts, this movement has succeeded in making lasting changes to public discourse and policy discussions.
The movement’s impact extends beyond its immediate objectives. It has redefined the way contemporary activism is conducted, emphasizing inclusivity, decentralization, and the use of digital tools. These lessons have permeated subsequent movements and continue to shape the landscape of social and political change.
In reflection, it is clear that this movement has been effective in achieving some of its goals. It has succeeded in raising awareness about crucial issues, mobilizing a diverse range of supporters, and even influencing policy changes in some instances. The movement serves as a testament to the enduring power of activism and the role of social media in modern social and political movements.
Works Cited
Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexander Segerberg. “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 15, no. 5, 2012, pp. 739-768.
Bimber, Bruce, Andrew J. Flanagin, and Cynthia Stohl. Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Branch, Taylor. Parting the Waters: America in the King Years 1954-63. Simon & Schuster, 1988.
Castells, Manuel. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture (Vol. 1). Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
Castells, Manuel. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity, 2012.
Coombs, W. Timothy, and Sherry J. Holladay. PR Strategy and Application: Managing Influence. Wiley, 2012.
Della Porta, Donatella, and Mario Diani. Social Movements: An Introduction. Wiley, 2009.
Earl, Jennifer, and Katrina Kimport. Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. MIT Press, 2011.
Entman, Robert M. Scandal and Silence: Media Responses to Presidential Misconduct. Wiley, 2012.
Gandhi, Mahatma K. Non-Violent Resistance (Satyagraha). Courier Corporation, 1993.
Gamson, William A. The Strategy of Social Protest (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing, 1988.
Haines, Herbert H. Black Radicalization and the Funding of Civil Rights: 1957-1970. Social Problems, vol. 31, no. 1, 1983, pp. 31-43.
Johannessen, Jon-Arild, and Svenne Kristiansen. Analyzing Professional Communication: Discourses, Dialogues, and Databases. Routledge, 2013.
Karpf, David. Analytic Activism: Digital Listening and the New Political Strategy. Oxford University Press, 2012.
Keane, John. The Life and Death of Democracy. Simon & Schuster, 2009.
Luban, David. “The Sorry State of Legal Ethics.” Texas Law Review, vol. 85, no. 4, 2007, pp. 963-992.
McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
McDonald, Robert J. Embattled Wilderness: The Natural and Human History of Robinson Forest and the Fight for Its Future. University Press of Kentucky, 2002.
Sharp, Gene. Waging Nonviolent Struggle: 20th Century Practice and 21st Century Potential. Extending Horizons Books, 2005.
Smith, Adam. Rethinking the Financial Crisis: Capitalist and Societal Fallibility. Wiley, 2009.
Sunstein, Cass R. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press, 2017.
Tarrow, Sidney. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Tufekci, Zeynep. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press, 2017.
Wojcieszak, Magdalena E., and Robert Smith. “Getting Attention: Emotional Appeals in Political Advertising and the Moderating Role of Involvement.” Political Communication, vol. 31, no. 2, 2014, pp. 175-197.
FREQUENT ASK QUESTION (FAQ)
Q1: What is the main focus of the post-2000s movement discussed in the paper?
A1: The main focus of the post-2000s movement is to bring about social and political change through innovative agitation strategies, digital activism, and civil disobedience. It aims to address pressing issues and challenge the status quo.
Q2: How did the global financial crisis of 2008 contribute to the emergence of this movement?
A2: The global financial crisis of 2008 catalyzed widespread disillusionment with the existing economic order, leading to social unrest and calls for reform. This crisis served as a significant backdrop for the emergence of the post-2000s movement.
Q3: What is the internal structure of the movement, and why is it characterized as decentralized?
A3: The movement has a decentralized structure characterized by grassroots activism, democratic decision-making, and horizontal leadership. It avoids traditional hierarchical models, allowing for swift responses to emerging issues and promoting inclusivity.
Q4: What were the two key agitation strategies employed by the movement, and how did they operate?
A4: The movement primarily employed digital activism, using social media and online campaigns to mobilize support and raise awareness. It also utilized civil disobedience, including non-violent protests and acts of resistance, to capture attention and pressure institutions.
Q5: How did the establishment respond to the movement’s agitation, and what strategies of control did they employ?
A5: The establishment responded through counter-mobilization efforts, including reputation management, legal actions, and framing the movement as a threat to public order. They aimed to discredit the movement and deter its activities.
The Benefits of Sortmyessay.com
Sortmyessay.com is an online academic writing site that provides custom-written papers to help students succeed in their studies. It offers a wide range of services and features that make the process more efficient, time-saving and cost-effective for customers. Here are some of the main benefits of using Sortmyessay.com:
• Quality Assurance: All papers on Sortmyessay are written by qualified experts with vast experience in their field who have gone through a rigorous selection process before being approved as writers on the platform. Customers can be sure that they will receive top-notch quality assignments every time they order from SortMyEssay.
• Affordable Prices: Prices at SortMyEssay.com start from as low as $10 per page making them affordable to students even when working with tight budgets. Additionally, the website also offers several discounts and deals to make it easier for customers to get their desired results within budget constraints.
• Fast Delivery: Orders placed at sort my essay can be delivered within 24 hours depending on their complexity and urgency level thus saving students valuable time which would otherwise have been spent searching for other alternatives or waiting unnecessarily long periods of time before receiving finished documents/papers from other providers elsewhere who may not be able to meet tight deadlines without compromising on quality levels..
• Safe & Secure Payment Methods: Payments made through this website are securely processed via PayPal which ensures complete privacy and peace of mind when ordering items online without having to worry about any potential data breaches or theft along the way due its industry leading encryption technology used across all transactions carried out here each day. This guarantees security and total assurance among customers knowing that all payments made go directly into sort my essay’s hands alone eliminating any chances whatsoever of fraudulence taking place throughout this entire process..
• Professional Writers/Editors Team– The team behind sort my essay has put together a panel consisting of professional writers and editors who possess several years’ experiencein both academic writing and editing industries combined for meeting all customer requirements effectively within specified deadline frames while always striving towards the highest standards possible even when faced with difficult tasks which require extra effort on part of these experts regardless..
• 24/7 Customer Support Service – One unique feature about sortmyessayservice is that it provides round the clock support to clients through live chat so as to ensure they are never left stranded when facing any difficulties whatsoever while placing orders or inquiring about any matters concerning their current projects being handled by respective writers assigned on such cases at given moment..
• Free Revisions – SortmyEssays always strive towards delivering perfectly written assignments with no errors whatsoever such that customers would not need to request further changes but if unforeseen circumstances lead to unsatisfactory results, we have a free revision policy meant to provide necessary modificationsneededfor final paper presentation upon requesting it from support team available 24/7
Categories Of Assignments Done By Writers On The Site
• Essays – essays submitted must follow certain rules regarding format, content, style, grammar etc; hence professional writers are needed here since they know how best to navigate these boundaries by drafting high grade materials quickly than anyone else could ever hope achieve same goal within stipulated timeframe.
• Research Papers – research papers must also adhere to a certain criteria. Experienced writers understand intricacies involved and they create excellent pieces filled with interesting facts and relevant information pertaining any topic.
• Dissertations – dissertation writing is a complex process which requires extensive research and thorough analysis of given data sets in order to come up with original results that are supported by relevant evidence. Sortmyessay.com’s team of writers comprises PhD students and graduates from different fields, who can handle even the most challenging dissertations within short deadlines whilst maintaining top-notch quality standards throughout every stage of the project for complete satisfaction of customers.
• Term Papers – term papers are another type of assignment that requires technical skills as well as knowledge on a particular subject in order to produce results that meet expectations established beforehand between customer & writer prior to commencing the actual task by following detailed instructions sent during initial stages outlining exact requirements necessary fulfill project successfully completion period allowed…
• Coursework – coursework writing involves researching various topics or subjects thoroughly while using information gathered from reliable sources our writers will be with you throughout your course to support you with the preriquisite support to excel in any subject.
• Thesis Writing – thesis writing is one tough job and can be quite daunting for many students. Sortmyessay understands this fact very well and provides comprehensive support to help you complete your thesis quickly and accurately so as to get highest grades possible without having to worry about anything else at all times throughout entire duration.
• Lab Reports – lab reports are another type of assignment that requires technical skills as well as knowledge on a particular subject in order to produce results that meet expectations established beforehand between customer & writer prior to commencing actual task.
• PowerPoint Presentations – this is yet another specialized form of academic writing where experienced writers from Sortmyessay.com are capable of creating slideshows, presentations or any other materials such as videos and infographics etc, upon request from clients for given tasks at hand so as to make it easier for them convey their message effectively amongst target audiences using visual aids which could be used during meeting sessions conferences lectures seminars etc.. This can help students save valuable time during preparation phases which would otherwise have been spent trying to figure out the best ways present ideas properly through powerpoint slides instead focusing more core content subject matter topic discussed covering wider aspects involved while still maintaining brevity formatting style….
• Editing/Proofreading Services – sort my essay also provides professional proofreading and editing services to customers who want their papers checked over by qualified experts before submitting them officially after final revisions made where necessary following feedback received from customer side regarding satisfaction levels achieved after checking over end results of assigned task.
This way customers can rest assured knowing that their wor kis error free and up-to-par with highest standards possiblet hus giving them edge over competition when it comes to publicly presenting their research.
• Book Reviews – Book reviews are quite common among students and can be a great way to get insight into different topics while still learning the basics of literature. Sortmyessay provides book reviews which are written by professional writers who have read the given book thoroughly and possess vast knowledge about its themes, characters, plot etc., so as to make sure that customers receive an honest opinion regarding the work in question after thorough analysis before making any final decisions themselves…..
• Admission Essays – Admission essays are one of the most important criteria for getting admission into top universities or colleges. It is essential that these papers convey your message clearly and concisely without any mistakes whatsoever so as to ensure success in your application process. Sortmyessay’s team of expert writers has years of experience writing such essays which can greatly increase chances of being accepted into desired educational institutes with ease thus helping students reach their goals faster than ever before thanks to timely advice provided throughout entire duration starting till end result finalized released respective student/instructor officially announcing successful completion.