The traditional approach to medical decision-making in which physicians are solely responsible for choosing treatment is being challenged. Encourage shared decision-making to encourage patients to express their views and preferences and participate in decisions related to their care. Opponents of shared decision-making say that most patients don’t want to have a voice; that disclosing the uncertainties inherent in health care can be detrimental; that it is impractical to provide information about the potential risks and benefits of all available treatment options; Participation of patients in decision-making will increase the need for unnecessary, expensive, or harmful procedures, which may undermine the equitable distribution of medical resources (Ankolekar et al., 2019). This article examines the evidence for and against these claims. Although little research has been done on situations where shared decision-making should be encouraged and its implications, there is strong evidence that patients want more information and participation (Driever et al., 2020). To enable patients to take an active role in treatment decisions, additional research into patients’ information preferences and needs and the development and evaluation of decision support tools are urgently needed. continue…